Dining Mahogany Gateleg Tables

TABLESĀ  dining, mahogany gateleg, shaped foot, 1735-1760
Just as the stretchers disappeared from chairs in the early part of the eighteenth century, so mahogany dining tables rid themselves of stretchers at much the same time. Perhaps it was the strength of mahogany or simply the desire to refine. Whatever the reason, some superb tables emerged. Good quality examples are perhaps current738 (opposite page, top left) Elegant use of the pied-debiche foot from which the cabriole originated, decorated with the ram’s head. The cabriole is beautifully executed. The top pieces, each
of one plank, are without warp or twist. The rule joints are in immaculate condition. Heavy Cuban mahogany at its best.
Another example with pied-de-biche foot and the little projection behind it, but with a simple decoration on the knee and a small scroll either side. The top has the same thumb-nail mould but each flap is made up of two planks. All features which, together with smaller size, reduce the price. c. 1740
Conventional cabrioles with ball-and-claw again. Well executed but looking almost clumsy against 738. In fact by itself an elegant table. A walnut style carried on into mahogany. 1730-1740
Without the panache of 738, but undeniably elegant in dark, almost figureless Cuban or Spanish mahogany. These pieces are enduringly made and, when this book was first written in 1978, were undervalued, but the price has since doubled. Shown both closed and open to make the point that such a table fulfils the dual purpose of elegant side table and comfortable dining table for four to six people. Appears to have glorious patination.
With gently curved cabrioles, which like the previous example have a simple C scroll at the top, this table could be walnut period but is in fact mahogany. The moulding is slightly unusual with only a very shallow depression and a very wide flat curve almost like a Victorian slope. Rectangular flaps are not as popular as oval. c. 1750
The more simple pad foot version on a straight leg of tapering circular section which, in comparison with 741, gives the unfortunate impression that the weight of the flap is proving exhausting. Nevertheless, very English in concept and clearly related to its country cousin in oak.
Quite literally the oak version of 743. Interesting to see the heavy structure beneath as though the maker would have preferred the old oak method. c. 1760

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply